> -----Original Message----- > From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.bru...@keymile.com] > Sent: Monday, 28 November, 2016 09:22 > To: Jon Maloy <jon.ma...@ericsson.com>; tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [tipc-discussion] TIPC link statistic > > Hi Jon, > > On 28/11/16 14:53, Jon Maloy wrote: > >> I saw your patch "tipc: fix link statistics counter errors". I assume it > >> should > >> > tackle this issue? I gave it a try with kernel 4.9.0-rc7 on my kmeter1 > >> > board > >> > which is a 32 bit powerpc board. Unfortunately the counters are still > >> > wrong > in > >> > the link statistic. Received packets don't appear at all and transmitted > >> > packages to a remote node are accounted on the broadcast link. > > I believe you are talking only about the broadcast link here? The figures > > for > > broadcast reception are currently missing by design, i.e., they have always > > been missing. We would need to scan across all broadcast reception links (on > > the contrary, there is only one broadcast transmission link, which makes > > that > > task easy) and accumulate all values, as well as presenting the figures for > > the individual links. It is not a particularly big or difficult task, but it > > is certainly more than the small bug corrections I just delivered. I cannot > > prioritize this myself right now. > > no I am not talking about the broadcast link in particular, it was only > another > thing I noticed. > > I have a TIPC link between two ethernet ports and I send packets > connectionless > from a client to a server running on the other side of the link. And what I > still see is that the RX and TX counter are not increasing in the link > statistic. After sending 300 packets with a size of 10kB I see: > > Link <1.1.9:eth2-1.1.211:eth1> > ACTIVE MTU:1500 Priority:10 Tolerance:1500 ms Window:50 packets > RX packets:6 fragments:0/0 bundles:0/0 > TX packets:4 fragments:0/0 bundles:0/0 > TX profile sample:2 packets average:60 octets > 0-64:100% -256:0% -1024:0% -4096:0% -16384:0% -32768:0% -66000:0% > RX states:17978 probes:368 naks:0 defs:2 dups:2 > TX states:17772 probes:17386 naks:2 acks:16 dups:0 > Congestion link:0 Send queue max:0 avg:0 > > I just wanted to know that this is a known bug or if there is something wrong > in > my setup. > > Best regards > Holger
The explanation is simple: the patch is not applied on net-next yet, only on net. It normally takes a few days before David re-applies fixes to net back to net-next. Since you anyway checked out net-next, you could try to apply the patch yourself. ///jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ tipc-discussion mailing list tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
