Hi Tipsters,
I’m facing a rather surprising situation at the moment. In discussing
Intelligence and its distribution in the population, I naturally touched on the
“gifted”, as well as on “mental retardation”. One
student was offended that I would use such a “crude and archaic”
term. She then went to the Learning Disability centre where she volunteers and
shared with them that I was still using such terminology (mental retardation). According
to the student, when she told them about it (director, supervisor,
psychologist), they just about spit their coffee on the spot! She reports that
they could not believe I would use such terminology. Wow! Ok. So, after talking
with the student, I started to wonder if I had perhaps missed the boat at some
point or another. So I went back to all the Intro texts lining my bookshelf (thanks
to all the publishers who keep sending them my way), and looked up various
sections on intelligence. Well, they all use Mental Retardation as a classification,
even the Canadian Edition (as Canadians sometimes tend to be very politically
correct, I thought that for sure I would find some form of warning in there). Here are two that I
looked at: Myers, D.G. (2004). Psychology (7th ed.). Lefton, And the list goes on…
Geee… Even the DSM has it as a classification. It feels rather strange to
being accused of being so discriminatory and backwards when in fact I strongly
urge my students to stay away from labelling individuals. As such, I press them
to avoid using such terms as “schizophrenic, alcoholic, depressed”,
and so on when referring to individuals. I tell them to talk about the
conditions instead. So, I’m curious to
hear about your opinions on the matter. Is it still ok to talk about Mental
Retardation? Or should I move towards what her mentors suggested: Mentally
challenged, or even “gifted” (she said they were moving in that
direction to replace mental retardation). Cheers to all! Jean-Marc You are currently subscribed to tips as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
- Mental Retardation - Improper terminology? Jean-Marc Perreault
- Re: Mental Retardation - Improper terminology? Joan Warmbold
- Re: Mental Retardation - Improper terminology? Christopher D. Green
- Re: Mental Retardation - Improper terminology? Paul Brandon
- RE: Mental Retardation - Improper terminology? Jean-Marc Perreault
- RE: Mental Retardation - Improper terminology? Martin Bourgeois
- RE: Mental Retardation - Improper terminology? Stuart McKelvie
- Re: Mental Retardation - Improper terminology? Jim Clark
- Re: Mental Retardation - Improper terminology? Blackman, Duncan DCRE
- Re: Mental Retardation - Improper terminology? Paul Brandon
- Re: Mental Retardation - Improper terminology? Jim Clark