Christopher D. Green wrote:
> Paul Brandon wrote:
>> But in the long run no one beats the chimp with a dart board.
>
> "In the long run, we'll all be dead."
> - John Kenneth Galbraith

Sorry, I was wrong. It was Galbraith's economic inspiration John Maynard 
Keynes in /A Tract on Monetary Reform/ (1923).

Chris Green
York U.
Toronto
===============
>>
>> On Nov 24, 2008, at 10:24 AM, Paul C Bernhardt wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not sure what Stephen would include under "technical analysis" 
>>> either.
>>>
>>> But, the term Technical Analysis has a precise meaning among stock 
>>> traders.
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_analysis
>>> http://stockcharts.com/school/doku.php?id=chart_school
>>> http://www.investopedia.com/university/technical/
>>>
>>> It is a collection of numerical and pattern interpretation 
>>> procedures of the
>>> past behavior of a security (price and volume of trading, usually) 
>>> that are
>>> used to determine the near and long term change in value of that 
>>> security.
>>>
>>> Technical analysis does not take into account any financial 
>>> characteristics
>>> of the economy, nation, sector of operations, company finances, 
>>> sales, cash
>>> flow, outstanding shares, competitive position, etc. It is just 
>>> based on
>>> charts of the past behavior of the stock (or other security) price.
>>
>> I'm not sure that this is true in practice -- too much competition 
>> and pressure to get an edge.
>> The good news is (as Paul Meehl would predict) that it does better 
>> than other types of financial modeling.
>> That's why I invest exclusively in index funds.
>>
>>> Example: Technical analysis occasionally talk in terms of "head and
>>> shoulder" patterns (meaning the stock will head downward due to 
>>> 'falling off
>>> the other shoulder.' (I'm not kidding.)
>>> http://www.chartpatterns.com/headandshoulders.htm
>>>
>>> From what I can tell, in its degree of scholarship and supporting 
>>> evidence
>>> it is indistinguishable from psychic readings. Therefore, it is no 
>>> surprise
>>> to me that stock brokers and traders are calling psychics in greater 
>>> numbers
>>> (assuming the anecdotes in the story represent an actual trend). 
>>> Many of
>>> them believe in Technical Analysis regardless of its lack of 
>>> theoretical and
>>> empirical support, so why not call a psychic, too?
>>
>>
>> Paul Brandon
>> Emeritus Professor of Psychology
>> Minnesota State University, Mankato
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to