This raises the issue of levels of observation and definition.
When talking about group behavior, we can either view (and define) it
as an aggregate of individuals (molecular), or as an emergent process
at a higher level of observation (molar), in which case we have a new
phenomenon which doesn't simply obey the rules of a sum of
individuals and requires a new definition at its own level of
observation.
This often has practical (applied) advantages since we usually
measure practical success at a more molar level of observation.
On Jul 22, 2009, at 1:59 PM, John Kulig wrote:
Mike
I agree ... also thinking of the ant colonies (and bees) which also
behave en-masse ... they are certain societal rules that regulate
their group behavior. Hempel (vis Chris Green) said it best I think
in cautioning that strict definitions might discourage the openness
of inquiry. By 'profitability' below I meant whether the work
advances theory and/or practical applications ...
Paul Brandon
Emeritus Professor of Psychology
Minnesota State University, Mankato
paul.bran...@mnsu.edu
---
To make changes to your subscription contact:
Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)
