Mike Palij wrote:
> Shameless self-promoter! :-) 

Why, thank you! And while we're on the subject of me :-), this interview 
came out today: 
http://www.thepsychologist.org.uk/archive/archive_home.cfm?volumeID=23&editionID=195&ArticleID=1769

> In the meantime, for those who've given up their subscriptions to the 
> American Scientist, here's a review of the Daston & Galison book that 
> provides, I think, a reasonable (dare I say "objective") view as well 
> as some of its limitations; see: 
> http://www.americanscientist.org/bookshelf/pub/how-to-be-objective

I agree. This is a fine review of the book. You can find an interview 
with Lorraine Daston about objectivity here: 
http://www.cbc.ca/ideas/episodes/2009/01/02/how-to-think-about-science-part-1---24-listen/#episode2
 


Best,
Chris
-- 

Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada

 

416-736-2100 ex. 66164
chri...@yorku.ca
http://www.yorku.ca/christo/

==========================


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=6731
or send a blank email to 
leave-6731-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to