Not only is pretesting randomly assigned groups not a common practice, outside 
of the Solomon four-group design, it can lead to the pretesting being a threat 
to internal validity. If pretesting is to be the basis for matching, there 
should be a good justification for not leaving the equalization of the groups 
to random assignment. 

Rick

Rick Froman
rfro...@jbu.edu

On Mar 13, 2012, at 12:45 PM, "Jim Clark" <j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca> wrote:

> Hi
> 
> I was surprised to see that the evidential level for some of the recommended 
> practices was moderate rather than strong (e.g., spacing learning over time). 
>  On reading the guidelines for these classifications, it appears likely to me 
> that the issue may be pre-testing to demonstrate equivalence of groups 
> randomly determined.  This is not a common practice in randomized designs, 
> nor should it be necessary to draw a strong conclusion, I would think.
> 
> Take care
> Jim
> 
> James M. Clark
> Professor of Psychology
> 204-786-9757
> 204-774-4134 Fax
> j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca
> 
>>>> "Jonathan Mueller" <jfmuel...@noctrl.edu> 13-Mar-12 12:16 PM >>>
> The testing effect is built upon forced recall.  Research consistently finds 
> that recall is superior to recognition for retrieval practice.  This guide 
> from the Institute of Education Sciences
> 
> http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practice_guides/20072004.pdf 
> 
> provides a nice overview of several recommendations the research supports on 
> how to promote effective learning.  Recommendation 5b addresses the testing 
> effect and provides some references for support.
> 
> Jon
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ===============
> Jon Mueller
> Professor of Psychology
> North Central College
> 30 N. Brainard St.
> Naperville, IL 60540
> voice: (630)-637-5329
> fax: (630)-637-5121
> jfmuel...@noctrl.edu 
> http://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu 
>>>> Michael Britt <mich...@thepsychfiles.com> 3/13/2012 12:06 PM >>>
> Lots of research lately on the effectiveness of retrieval practice (i.e., 
> testing effect).  I haven't seen any that answers this question: is it better 
> to test oneself using recognition methods (multiple choice questions) or 
> recall (fill in the blank).  I would guess that practice using recall would 
> enhance the testing effect.  Anyone know?
> 
> Michael
> 
> Michael A. Britt, Ph.D.
> mich...@thepsychfiles.com 
> http://www.ThePsychFiles.com 
> Twitter: mbritt
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: jfmuel...@noctrl.edu.
> To unsubscribe click here: 
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13269.01f6211e00cc8f00a7b68e8e24b1b4d6&n=T&l=tips&o=16661
>  
> or send a blank email to 
> leave-16661-13269.01f6211e00cc8f00a7b68e8e24b1b...@fsulist.frostburg.edu 
> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca.
> To unsubscribe click here: 
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a891720c9&n=T&l=tips&o=16662
>  
> or send a blank email to 
> leave-16662-13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a89172...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: rfro...@jbu.edu.
> To unsubscribe click here: 
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13039.37a56d458b5e856d05bcfb3322db5f8a&n=T&l=tips&o=16664
> or send a blank email to 
> leave-16664-13039.37a56d458b5e856d05bcfb3322db5...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=16667
or send a blank email to 
leave-16667-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to