On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 14:19 -0400, Dave Garrett wrote: > I occasionally see people ask why we're calling it TLS 1.3 when so > much has changed, and I used to simply think that it was too > bikesheddy to bother changing at this point. However, now that we've > redone negotiation, we have new TLS 1.3+ only cipher suites. The old > are not compatible with the new (new codepoints needed for old > ciphers) and the new are not backwards compatible with the old > (they'll just be ignored). We actually risk misconfiguration in the > future if the distinction isn't made clear. I think it's time we just > renamed TLS 1.3 to TLS 2.0. There are major changes, so labeling it a > major version seems more appropriate.
I agree with the proposal. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
