On 03/11/17 09:28, Martin Thomson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Matt Caswell <m...@openssl.org> wrote: >> >> It was my understanding that it is precisely this sort of problem that >> this draft was attempting to address. Explicit marking would solve this. > > Yes, and the connection ID is that marking. The contention - I think > - is what to do when there is a mix of marked connections and > unmarked.
Right - where you have a mix of packets with connection ID and no connection ID you don't know whether to look for one or not. IMO this draft won't really be addressing the issues unless it includes a mechanism for determining that. Matt _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
