On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 8:31 PM Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 8:17 PM Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk= > 40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 07:17:44PM -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote: >> > >> > The issue I am concerned about is that: >> > 1. Implementors who do not want to upgrade to TLS 1.3 will implement >> new >> > cipher suites >> > 2. IANA will refuse to register the new cipher suites >> > With the result being potential code point collisions. >> >> I share this concern. >> > > In the interest of clarity, I favor the WG declining to work on extending > TLS 1.2, so these cipher suites should be marked as Recommended=No. I'm > just concerned that closing the registries entirely will not have the best > results. > Yes, this way seems to reflect the spirit of the IETF. That course of action may not enjoy consensus, but we should still welcome a description. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
