* Is there WG consensus for registering code points? To my understanding, OpenSSL 3.5 LTS already uses the unregistered numbers in the draft.
I am not disagreeing, but that would be dumb of OpenSSL. If different numbers are assigned, then OpenSSL would have to change, and also update their FIPS validation. It would not be the first time someone shipped without waiting for the IETF. Good thing the DE’s are unlikely to be petty :) Consensus is not needed to get IANA assignments. The draft authors could do so by making a request as described in https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-15.html#name-registration-requests I guess anyone could make the request, actually.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
