Same here. It’s fine to say “there is no consensus to adopt at this time, try again later”. It’s fine to say “there is consensus to adopt, so this will be a WG item moving forward through the process”. “Adopted and parked” makes no sense to me.
Cheers, Andrei From: Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2025 9:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [EXTERNAL] [TLS] Re: Second WG Adoption Call for Use of SLH-DSA in TLS 1.3 On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 9:38 AM D. J. Bernstein <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Joseph Salowey writes: > The chairs feel that the following is the best approach to move forward: > Adopt the draft and park it There was a call _for adoption_. The specified call period is over. The chairs now have to issue a clear declaration of either "Yes, there was consensus to adopt" or "No, there was not consensus to adopt", so that there's a record of the result and so that people who think the chairs erred (in whichever direction) have the ability to appeal I also find myself confused by the email from the chairs. Is it trying to say "we believe there is consensus to adopt the draft and so it is hereby adopted" or "we believe this is the right way forward and we are taking the WG's temperature". Chairs, can you please clarify? -Ekr
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
