"D. J. Bernstein" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > As for SecP256r1MLKEM768 and SecP384r1MLKEM1024 in this draft, the
> > > current status is that they're basically not supported in
> > > deployments at all.
> > acm.us-west-1.amazonaws.com (US),
>   [ etc. ]
> 
> I stand by what I said. The top-100000-sites survey from
> 
>     https://www.netmeister.org/blog/pqc-use-2025-03.html

There have been some changes since March.  My latest
results from September show 6,159 sites supporting
SecP256r1MLKEM768 (vs. 38,931 supporting
X25519MLKEM768).

https://www.netmeister.org/blog/pqc-use-2025-09.html

But at this point, it looks to me like it's basically
just AWS Cloudfront that supports SecP256r1MLKEM768
(as reflected in the selection of services Panos
posted).

-Jan

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to