To be clear the only change I want to see is Recommend Y by X25519MLKEM768. I think additional registrations/choices can be added in another document.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 6:47 AM Joseph Salowey <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is the working group last call for Post-quantum hybrid ECDHE-MLKEM Key > Agreement for TLSv1.3. Please review draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem [1] and reply > to this thread indicating if you think it is ready for publication or not. > If you do not think it is ready please indicate why. This call will end on > October 22, 2025. > > Please note that during the WG adoption call, Dan Bernstein pointed out some > potential IPR (see [2]), but no IPR disclosure has been made in accordance > with BCP 79. Additional information is provided here; see [3]. > > BCP 79 makes this important point: > > (b) The IETF, following normal processes, can decide to use > technology for which IPR disclosures have been made if it decides > that such a use is warranted. > > WG members can take this information into account during the working group > last call. > > Reminder: This working group last call has nothing to do with picking the > mandatory-to-implement cipher suites in TLS. > > Cheers, > Joe & Sean > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem/ > [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/mt4_p95NZv8duZIJvJPdZV90-ZU/ > [3] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/GKFhHfBeCgf8hQQvhUcyOJ6M-kI/ > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] -- Astra mortemque praestare gradatim _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
