Hi Nico, On 06.04.26 23:58, Nico Williams wrote:
Just to be on the same page and that there is no misunderstanding: which posts? Preference for hybrids has always been my top concern (e.g., see [0]). So nothing has really changed in my position. In fact, that's why I isolated the recommendation for hybrids (draft-usama-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-update) from deprecation of other algorithms, since the latter will take longer.On Mon, Apr 06, 2026 at 11:56:52PM +0200, Muhammad Usama Sardar wrote:Viktor is not against publication, but wants guidance saying that at this time we prefer hybridsI strongly support Viktor's ask for guidance. Unfortunately, that is not what's happening in the draft repo. Hence, my worry.That's a more nuanced statement of your position than that which I was getting from your posts.
If we absolutely have to: addressing the concerns in [0] and the ones by others mentioned in my email that you are replying to.I think after all this we can probably find consensus to publish with such language.
Best, -Usama [0] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/oiVmp3PCo9H6aiugPQ8aVFztvVg/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
