Hi Russ, On 06.04.26 20:42, Russ Housley wrote:
You can find reports and minutes with your favorite search engine. For example: https://www.ieee802.org/11/Reports/index.html
Except that the relevant minutes for the relevant (March) meeting are missing.
Of course, I had seen and already cited the report of March meeting in my email [0]. It provides no technical rationale why they are supporting pure ML-KEM, e.g., any research (e.g., cryptanalysis) that they have done that we can cite in the draft.
It deeply surprises me that IEEE is starting off its PQC transition with non-hybrids rather than hybrids. If they have done no analysis, we should tell them the risks and that hybrids are currently preferable. That's why I keep emphasizing that we should first recommend hybrids and that risks should be thoroughly mentioned in pure ML-KEM draft, if we are to publish it.
Best regards, -Usama [0] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/OqtPeFy43oFjZO89lb4RfdGkmkg/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
