Nico, I assure you that for this issue “coercion” is not the case for many users, including myself. Purely understanding of science, and technical requirements (beyond the pure theoretical “crypto papers”).
-- V/R, Uri There are two ways to design a system. One is to make it so simple there are obviously no deficiencies. The other is to make it so complex there are no obvious deficiencies. C. A. R. Hoare From: Nico Williams <[email protected]> Date: Monday, April 6, 2026 at 17:39 To: Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL <[email protected]> Cc: Muhammad Usama Sardar <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [TLS] Re: [EXT] Re: New Liaison Statement, "Liaison communication to IETF regarding draft-ietf-tls-mlkem" !-------------------------------------------------------------------| This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside the Laboratory. |-------------------------------------------------------------------! On Mon, Apr 06, 2026 at 07:54:44PM +0000, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL wrote: > For how much longer will the opponents of non-hybrid (because the > other side has nothing against hybrids — they simply want the freedom > to exercise other options, based on their educated conclusion) beat > this dead horse? The issue, I think, is that some of "the other side" that want to "exercise other options" may do so under coercion, but then, us not publishing the RFC does not alter that they will continue to so be. Nico --
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
