Jason R. Mastaler wrote:
>
> Drew Raines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ``odd'' just surprised me since those solutions are pretty
> > common.
>
> ``Pretty common'' in itself isn't justification for a
> non-standard solution.
POP-before-SMTP isn't in need of a standard. It's a
client-independent[1] feature contained within a system. How I
determine someone's ability to relay doesn't affect them unless
I deny their ability to relay.
> Never underestimate the importance of standards.
I won't! I promise.
[1] Except when clients try to send mail before checking it.
But that's not necessarily a ``standards'' issue.
_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
