"Ron Dyck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK, created a non TMDA account: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from [EMAIL PROTECTED] : > > 2003-11-29 20:47:35.057357500 new msg 1520828 > 2003-11-29 20:47:35.057361500 info msg 1520828: bytes 714 from > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 2535 uid 502 > 2003-11-29 20:47:35.069159500 starting delivery 146: msg 1520828 to local > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 2003-11-29 20:47:35.069162500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 > 2003-11-29 20:47:35.331942500 new msg 1520831 > 2003-11-29 20:47:35.331946500 info msg 1520831: bytes 2309 from <> qp 2546 > uid 89 > 2003-11-29 20:47:35.342502500 starting delivery 147: msg 1520831 to local > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 2003-11-29 20:47:35.342507500 status: local 2/10 remote 0/20 > 2003-11-29 20:47:35.342508500 delivery 146: success: did_0+0+1/ > 2003-11-29 20:47:35.342509500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 > 2003-11-29 20:47:35.342510500 end msg 1520828 > 2003-11-29 20:47:35.356266500 delivery 147: success: did_0+0+1/ > 2003-11-29 20:47:35.356270500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 > 2003-11-29 20:47:35.356271500 end msg 1520831
This sequence says that mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] works exactly right. > Then [EMAIL PROTECTED] sends reply to challenge and [EMAIL PROTECTED] > recieves the confirmation. > > 2003-11-29 20:50:19.097004500 new msg 1520828 > 2003-11-29 20:50:19.097008500 info msg 1520828: bytes 1563 from > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 2577 uid 502 > 2003-11-29 20:50:19.109868500 starting delivery 150: msg 1520828 to local > [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is the reply to test's challenge (from notmdauser). > 2003-11-29 20:50:19.380779500 new msg 1520831 > 2003-11-29 20:50:19.380784500 info msg 1520831: bytes 2822 from <> qp 2588 > uid 89 > 2003-11-29 20:50:19.391789500 starting delivery 151: msg 1520831 to local > [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is the confirmation (from test) that the challenge reply was successfully received. > 2003-11-29 20:50:19.434211500 new msg 1520832 > 2003-11-29 20:50:19.434215500 info msg 1520832: bytes 915 from > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 2590 uid 89 > 2003-11-29 20:50:19.436365500 starting delivery 152: msg 1520832 to local > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Finally, we start the (re-)delivery of the original message to test. > 2003-11-29 20:50:19.436367500 delivery 150: success: did_0+0+1/ Confirmation reply was successfully delivered... > 2003-11-29 20:50:19.436369500 delivery 151: success: did_0+0+1/ Successful confirmation notification was successfully delivered... > 2003-11-29 20:50:19.647752500 delivery 152: deferral: > See_/home/vpopmail/domains/test.dev/TMDA_DELIVERY_FAILURE_for_traceback/ Re-injection of the original message fails! This is the same message that, less than three minutes ago, successfully made it through to tmda-filter and was challenged. Is this traceback the same error as before (can't find the crypt_key file)? > [EMAIL PROTECTED] is in the white list. But attempts to send mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] from [EMAIL PROTECTED] fail and message appear to be stuck > in the queue. > > 2003-11-29 20:58:23.457954500 new msg 1520831 > 2003-11-29 20:58:23.457958500 info msg 1520831: bytes 707 from > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 2678 uid 502 > 2003-11-29 20:58:23.470312500 starting delivery 160: msg 1520831 to local > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 2003-11-29 20:58:23.470316500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 > 2003-11-29 20:58:23.820572500 delivery 160: deferral: > See_/home/vpopmail/domains/test.dev/TMDA_DELIVERY_FAILURE_for_traceback/ > 2003-11-29 20:58:23.820578500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 This is the same sequence as the first set of log entries, at the top, except that now notmdauser is in test's whitelist. And it dies! Does this traceback indicate a problem othern than the crypt_key? > Please let me know if this information is sufficient. The only thing I can think of is to request both of the above tracebacks, if you still have them. > I appreciate your assistance. No problem, although I wish I could be of more assistance. I've been using and developing TMDA for nearly 2 years and this is the weirdest thing I've ever seen. I'll keep trying to figure it out, though, as long as you have the patience to test and report. :) Tim _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
