thanks for your reply! What I was quite confused by is why tmda seemed to be working without any hassles on a FreeBSD 4.9 box using qmail, but not working 100 percent on a debian stable box using exim.
tmda is not in the debian stable distribution, thus, I had to go to "apt-get.org" to amend the apt sources-list to install it and python2.2. And debian-stable uses exim3 as its default MTA. I'm not a big fan of exim, but I thought I would use it. it's on the debian box that I can't communicate with other systems using tmda, while on the FreeBSD qmail box this seems to work quite well. cheers, t. On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 07:05:22PM -0700, Jason R. Mastaler wrote: > tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'll take another very long and close look at 5.4 as well. > > [...] > > > hmm, still a little dazed and confused on this. > > Conceptually it's pretty simple. When you send mail, make sure to > leave a clear and unhindered Return-Path back to your mailbox. If you > do this, TMDA challenges, bounces, and other automatic notices won't > get caught up in your own TMDA. The 'dated' return-path that the FAQ > discusses is one way to accomplish this. > _____________________________________________ > tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users > _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
