-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 01:17:17PM -0400, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
>When a TMDA installation replies to forged email, it becomes a spammer >just as annoying as stupid virus filters or mailing lists that reply to forged >email. [...] Do you consider mailing lists to be spammers? Just wondering. The earlier thread about this topic starts here: http://mla.libertine.org/tmda-workers/2004-01/msg00005.html The conclusion I see is for SPF to be in the MTA and for TMDA to pay attention to SPF-related headers added by the MTA. This is possible now, but not default. There's also some discussion of SRS, since TMDA does forwarding. I, for one, already decline to challenge email that fails SPF checks. - -- Kyle Hasselbacher | I've been offline for a while. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | I just hate it when that happens. -- Brent Busby -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFBAVEs10sofiqUxIQRAl2IAKC4DsmZg5yaUyGwjniQMb8/wjoZTQCY0b2O PYO3d1KjbDzw/vMzNOuogw== =TUMG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
