On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 03:25:51PM -0800, George Nachman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Nicholas Marriott > <[1]nicholas.marri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Actually I had a quick look now, > > Looks good, and the idea of using APC is a good one. > > A few things: > > - I think the handshake should have the tmux version or a protocol > version. I think the latter because the OpenBSD tmux doesn't have a > version number. > > Good idea. Changed. > > - Your list of options has some things that aren't options but are the > names of key tables (emacs-edit etc). > > Fixed. > > - There needs to be a mechanism to specify the client "identify" > information, particularly the terminfo description tmux should use but > also the terminal flags (if is UTF-8, 256 colours, 88 > colours). Easiest probably to have that as an argument to -C. > > Why not use -2, -8, -u?
Yep they are fine for flags, what about terminfo description? Passed as -C or in the protocol? > > Otherwise seems good. > > I'd say as a first step let's get the unsolicited bits tmux->terminal > working, I'll try and take a look at that this week time permitting. > > Great! I'm adding support for split panes, which is the last big missing > piece on my end. > > References > > Visible links > 1. mailto:nicholas.marri...@gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build, use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
