Paulo Gaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I like the harmony we had in this list during the last few weeks between the > main defenders of Tomcat 3.x and of Tomcat 4. I would like it to stay that > way. > > Both lines have its usefulness (3.3 included in the pack). We are having an > effort on getting a Production Ready 3.2 NOW by the same people that are > fighting for new evolutions. > > Isn't this the way it should be? 100% agree on that, wholeheartedly... Pier (happy thanksgiving day!) -- Pier P. Fumagalli Apache Software Foundation <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Neque porro quisquam est qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit... (Cicero: "De Finibus" 1.10.32)
- [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5 Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5 Jason Brittain
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5 Remy Maucherat
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5 Jason Brittain
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5 Remy Maucherat
- RE: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5 GOMEZ Henri
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5 Pier P. Fumagalli
- RE: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5 Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5 Pier P. Fumagalli
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5 Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5 Glenn Nielsen
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5 Pier P. Fumagalli
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5 cmanolache
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5 hgo
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5 Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5 Pier P. Fumagalli
- RE: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5 cmanolache
- RE: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5 Gomez Henri
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5 Craig R. McClanahan