You are right Christopher.
Besides the (a bit sarcastic[*]) sense of humor and besides knowing some
Latin expressions, you also make a lot of sense.
=:o)
Thanks for taking the time to explain it to me. (Seriously!)
Have fun,
Paulo
[*] Which is a "plus".
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Cain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 6:02 PM
>
>
> There were a few reasons that I didn't include a "separate mailing list"
> option in the vote. There seemed to be more a little more support for
> just having them come here to the dev list, and it's hard to effectively
> call a vote on three options instead of two, so I picked the one that
> would be more likely to pass.
>
> Also, while I might technically have the ability to call for a vote on
> anything, it's bad form to call a vote on something that you personally
> cannot make happen. Since I do not have the ability to set up a new
> mailing list, it would be the equivalent of me forcing more mailing list
> duties on Pier.
>
> Basically, I did the most that I could do. The only people who could
> realistically called for a vote on a new mailing list are Jon (who isn't
> in favor of it), Pier (who I think is fed up with the whole business at
> this point :), and Craig (who didn't say one way or the other). As I
> said, I don't personally care how they get into my inbox, so long as
> they do. So in calling a vote, I simply played the percentages.
>
> Incidentally, we miss you over, Paulo ;-)
>
> - Christopher
>
> /**
> * Pleurez, pleurez, mes yeux, et fondez vous en eau!
> * La moitié de ma vie a mis l'autre au tombeau.
> * ---Corneille
> */
>
> Paulo Gaspar wrote:
> > Christopher,
> >
> >
> > Since you are the VOTE proponent, could you take a look at my previous
> > suggestion:
> > - having a "tomcat-bugs" mailing list;
> > - having a _daily digest_ to "tomcat-dev" (which should refer the
> > existence of the bugs list).
> >
> > It was made clear along this discussion that BUG messages were removed
> > because people complained about clutter.
> >
> > The fact that they are faced as clutter by many defeats the idea of
> > getting more eye balls posting them all one by one - people will "jump
> > over" and ignore them just as everybody does to advertising banners.
> >
> >
> > The daily bug digest + bug list still sounds like a nice compromise to
> > me. I think that it is the best way to get more eye balls.
> >
> >
> > Anyway, I know I would prefer it this way, but I have no Karma to do
> > anything about that besides noise.
> >
> >
> > Thanks and have fun,
> > Paulo Gaspar
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Christopher Cain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:08 AM
> >>
> >>
> >>I'm going to go ahead and call this, in the name of peace and
> >>brotherhood :)
> >>
> >>---------
> >>
> >>Whenever a bug is entered or modified on Nagoya Bugzilla, should
> >>Tomcat-Dev
> >>receive a copy of the automatic e-mail notification sent to the
> >>"assigned"
> >>developer?
> >>
> >>[] +1 Tomcat-Dev should definitely be CC'ed a copy of the notifications
> >>[] +0 Sure, why not
> >>[] -0 I don't really care to see them, but I won't complain if I do :)
> >>[] -1 Leave it alone (explain)
> >>
> >>
> >>- Christopher
> >>
> >>/**
> >> * Pleurez, pleurez, mes yeux, et fondez vous en eau!
> >> * La moitié de ma vie a mis l'autre au tombeau.
> >> * ---Corneille
> >> */
>
