On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ryan to became more than just a contributer :)))) > > This is the third time we agree on something in less than 24 hours. This > implies that either I'm getting old, or just plain silly... Now, if you could agree on merging mod_webapp and mod_jk, that would be something... Costin
- [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from jakarta-t... Larry Isaacs
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... cmanolache
- RE: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... Keith Wannamaker
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... jean-frederic clere
- RE: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... Ignacio J. Ortega
- RE: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... GOMEZ Henri
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... Pier Fumagalli
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... cmanolache
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... Pier Fumagalli
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... cmanolache
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... Pier Fumagalli
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... Pier Fumagalli
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... cmanolache
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... Pier Fumagalli
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 f... Costin Manolache