"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >> "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Ryan to became more than just a contributer :)))) >> >> This is the third time we agree on something in less than 24 hours. This >> implies that either I'm getting old, or just plain silly... > > Now, if you could agree on merging mod_webapp and mod_jk, that would be > something... Slowwwwwww down... :) If mod_jk wants to start using APR, I believe we're talking, otherwise, I'm done with cross-platform porting, I live it to Ryan :) Pier
- [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from jakarta-t... Larry Isaacs
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... cmanolache
- RE: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... Keith Wannamaker
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... jean-frederic clere
- RE: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... Ignacio J. Ortega
- RE: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... GOMEZ Henri
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... Pier Fumagalli
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... cmanolache
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... Pier Fumagalli
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... cmanolache
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... Pier Fumagalli
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... Pier Fumagalli
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... cmanolache
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 from ... Pier Fumagalli
- Re: [VOTE] Removal of mod_jk for Apache 2.0 f... Costin Manolache