> > > I think we should tag the code with jk_1_4 ( considering > the jk that was > > included with 3.1 == jk1.1, etc ). It seems jk_1_4 will work > > with 3.3, 4.0.x and 4.1 ( and the C code can be used for > 3.2.x for bug > > fixes ). > > +1. > When it's done and when you can confirm it's working, I think > we can release > 4.0.2 b2 (I have only a few patches to commit to the branch > and it should be > ok). >
i believe the jk (not jk2) code, both native (jk/native) and java (jk/java/org/apache/ajp), in j-t-c to be working and in a stable state. > Could we do the same for webapp ? > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
