On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Well, the Java code looks very similar to me. So the native code could > easily be ported to j-t-s. > It's just that this code is 100% Tomcat-dependency free. So since it's some > generic capability other projects could want, I proposed to move it to the > commons, instead of leaving it as a hidden Tomcat subproject.
+1 :-) If we are doing that, should we also move j-t-c/utils to commons ? My proposal would be to use a different package name, so we can start adding/improving the utils without nasty class compatibility problems for 3.3. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
