> On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > Well, j-t-c/utils is more our core buisness. Since 4.0 or the connectors > > don't duplicate the code like 3.3 does, I'd say I don't like the idea too > > much. > > Or we can put them there, still keep the current ones, and start using the > > ones from the commons during the next release cycle. > > Sounds like a better and safer idea :-)
+1 then. > The problem is that I would like to make some changes to some utils, > like remove the util.Log deps, do some improvements ( a much cleaner > Notes for example ), etc. > > I don't want to destabilize the current code - but to gradually > start using the new stuff when ready. > > So keeping the current 'frozen' version ( and keeping it in sync > with 3.3 - which is also frozen as API, but does get fixes too ) > is the perfect for me. Yes, it's the most reasonable. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
