We will create really soon webpages for jakarta-tomcat-connectors projects which will cover that.
stay tuned - Henri Gomez ___[_]____ EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:11 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp > > >Maybe I've not kept up on the docs enough but ... > >I do think this thread, highlights a general confusion around tomcat. >Over the last couple of years, there have been many >mod_jk/jk2/webapp/warp/?? implementations, ajp versions etc, and even >when the discussions are on the list, it's still hard to be >able to say >(for lowly thread lurkers/tomcat users like myself), tomcat >X.x can use >mod_??, on ajp?.? because they provide xyz.. > >It would be nice to have a page in the docs, on the general tomcat >site, that gives a summary of what each native connector does in terms >of features, config, performance, load balancing, web servers >supported, whether still in development etc. > >-----Original Message----- >From: pier >Sent: 28 March 2002 12:52 >To: tomcat-dev >Cc: pier >Subject: Re: Mod_jk v/s mod_webapp > > >David Graff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Thanks for the pointer on that documentation. I was wondering where >the >> Javadoc style comments were being used at. > >You welcome... > >> I still don't think the question was really answered though as to the >> motivation of mod_webapp versus mod_jk/mod_jk2 development? Are >there any >> goals that have been made available to the public so that we >understand what >> the spawned these two different integration modules? > >Motivation? I don't like mod_jk, I wanted to use APR as a portable >runtime >for an Apache 1.3 module, I believe that the WARP protocol >with built-in >support for auto-deployment and web-application configuration is the >way to >go (rather than using mod_rewrite rules all the way around), and >because I >don't like Costin :) :) :) :) > >1.2.3. (BTW, all those "goals" passed over on this mailing list in the >past >2/3 years, check the archives...) > > Pier > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com > >This message contains confidential information and is intended only >for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you >should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please >notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this >e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. > >E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free >as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, >arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore >does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents >of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If >verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This >message is provided for informational purposes and should not be >construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or >related financial instruments. > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
