> David Graff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks for the pointer on that documentation. I was wondering where the > > Javadoc style comments were being used at. > > You welcome... > > > I still don't think the question was really answered though as to the > > motivation of mod_webapp versus mod_jk/mod_jk2 development? Are there any > > goals that have been made available to the public so that we understand what > > the spawned these two different integration modules? > > Motivation? I don't like mod_jk, I wanted to use APR as a portable runtime > for an Apache 1.3 module, I believe that the WARP protocol with built-in > support for auto-deployment and web-application configuration is the way to > go (rather than using mod_rewrite rules all the way around), and because I > don't like Costin :) :) :) :)
Umm, I posted a bug about this, what about the now infamous 404 (Apache started after Tomcat issue) and the fact that the manager app doesn't work when you try to create a new application due to apache indexing the apps when it starts. The only solution/workaround/kludge being to restart Apache? The other thing being; because mod_webapp ignores the rewrited filename preferring to still look at the raw uri means things like mod_rewrite don't apply (which for many people is an absolute necessity). Check the user lists to witness the frustration. (BTW, all those "goals" passed over on this mailing list in the past > 2/3 years, check the archives...) > > Pier > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
