> De: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: jueves 11 de abril de 2002 12:12
> > That's what is done. > > In HTTP/1.0, there's no host header defined in the spec, so a > client using > and expecting it to work is non-compliant. Well, obeying the Host header ever, can be rfc compliant, because "This specification reflects common usage of the protocol referred too as "HTTP/1.0". This specification describes the features that seem to be consistently implemented in most HTTP/1.0 clients and servers." ( excerpt from RFC 1945 ), so this is not a "real" RFC, at least not one that must be obeyed in a compulsory way :)), at this moment, 3.3 does obeys a Host header present in a HTTP1.0 request, so having no need to implement that rfc completely ( it's more a compilation of commons practices than a "must" rfc), to be consistent to what 3.3 does right now seems to me a very good reason to obey the Host Header if present ever.. Just some thoughts, HTTP1.0 discussions are today more than a little useless and academic.., :))) Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
