The standard way is to attach the output of "cvs diff" to an e-mail message with a subject beginning with the string "[PATCH]". If you continue to make work for us enough by doing this, eventually someone will propose you as a committer :-). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Sandberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:39 PM Subject: Re: SSI Servlet has big problems
> Remy Maucherat wrote: > > >>Implementing the SingleThreadedServlet interface will not help thi > >> > > > >Are you sure ? > >(I didn't look at the code at all, so I'm just wondering) > >Otherwise, it would be a really cheap way to make it work. > > > >Thanks for looking into it anyway. > > > > > > Implementing SingleThreadedServlet doesn't mean only one thread will be > running the servlet at a time. It means only one thread will be running > a given INSTANCE of the servlet. So you could still have two threads > running two different instances of the same servlet. This will still > get massively messed up with all the sharing of static variables. > > >>Are the two authors still mantaining this code? Bip Thelin? Amy Roh? > >> > >> > > > >Not really. I didn't hear about Bip for a while, and Amy has been busy with > >other things. > >Usually an easy way to get commit access if you have time to dedicate to > >contributing is to take over the maintenance of some abandoned component(s). > >CGI also needs a maintainer, BTW. > > > >Remy > > > I'll fix this problem, and I'll create a filter that does SSI on any > output ( so that a JSP page can use SSI, for example ). I don't have > any interest in being a maintainer/having commit access, however. > > So what's the best way to give back my bug fixes/filter? > > Thanks for the response, btw. > > -Dan > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
