> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: 12 de junio de 2002 18:46
> Can we just put it in the release notes, and focus on the > jni worker in jk2 ? ( i.e. people who use the JNI worker with > modjk1.1 should not upgrade ). > OK, i was only pointing to some problem i know of.., something to be at least documented.. i would not oppose, and if i would, i could try to fix it myself, no problem.. :) > Has anyone 'volunteered' as release manager for jk1.2 ? If > someone does, he can decide on the 'mustfix' bugs for the release, > and if this is listed I'll fix it. The silence can be masked :) Could we do some kind of collective RM for that relase? it's at least possible to do a release this way? Put up a list of tasks, another of bugs, vote and comment in what to do.. and simply do it.. Do we need a (benevolent) dictator for this? ( please take it as a comment, no negative feelings, but it seems to me , that to find a RM for that release could be hard, and seems it's an important release to someone, not me, i could help, but not take the role myself ) Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
