On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I agree it is valuable in some cases to not delegate - but we've > > seen far too many problems. It's better to let those who > > really need this and know what they're doing turn this on. > > The thing is that it looks like a terrific idea, but in the end it's not > so good once it is implemented.
Sometimes is more usefull to have fine control. I think it may be better to just change the order - i.e. the loader should default to 'delegate' for everything but be able to exclude specific packages ( right now it is the reverse ). What's important is to support the MANIFEST entries - and for that it may be needed to override some of the stuff from the common loader. Now - if you are going to work on that, it may be a good idea to try to move the loader in a separate dir ( commons-style ) and merge the 2 loaders ( there's a lot of duplicated code ). I'm not saying to move it in commons yet, but at least have it useable independently. I would love to add few hooks and use it in ant... Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
