Ramon Pons wrote:
Ok, you are rigth. In a few minutes will be ready. Regards, Ramon
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
the best solution for this will not be found until we have
an extensive test suite to test use of mod_jk 1/2 with other
modules. So if a change is made we can make sure use of
mod_jk with other modules hasn't been broken.
Jean-Frederic Clere send us a link to a french site where the
Apache specialist speaking about jk2 and rewrite used jk2
in FIRST but indicating that rewrite is the precedent.
Why using APR_HOOK_MIDDLE for translate_name :
- It will be like mod_jk.
- It works for me with mod_dav and mod_rewrite (fixes 21549 and 21546).
Why not using APR_HOOK_FIRST: - It does not work with mod_dav.
BTW: Mod_dav.c does not have translate_name I use a <Location> to get DAV
activated on the needed URL. Core.c use APR_HOOK_REALLY_LAST and
mod_rewrite
APR_HOOK_FIRST so I do not understand why 21546 get fixed by using
APR_HOOK_MIDDLE.
Ok, so I revert to APR_HOOK_MIDDLE for now, it will be the same as jk
Should I close the corresponding bugs?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
