Henri Gomez wrote: > jean-frederic clere wrote: > >> Henri Gomez wrote: >> >>> Glenn Nielsen wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Henri, >>>> >>>> It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook >>>> priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that >>>> the best solution for this will not be found until we have >>>> an extensive test suite to test use of mod_jk 1/2 with other >>>> modules. So if a change is made we can make sure use of >>>> mod_jk with other modules hasn't been broken. >>> >>> >>> >>> Jean-Frederic Clere send us a link to a french site where the >>> Apache specialist speaking about jk2 and rewrite used jk2 >>> in FIRST but indicating that rewrite is the precedent. >> >> >> >> Why using APR_HOOK_MIDDLE for translate_name : >> - It will be like mod_jk. >> - It works for me with mod_dav and mod_rewrite (fixes 21549 and 21546). >> >> Why not using APR_HOOK_FIRST: >> - It does not work with mod_dav. >> >> BTW: Mod_dav.c does not have translate_name I use a <Location> to get DAV >> activated on the needed URL. Core.c use APR_HOOK_REALLY_LAST and >> mod_rewrite >> APR_HOOK_FIRST so I do not understand why 21546 get fixed by using >> APR_HOOK_MIDDLE. > > > Ok, so I revert to APR_HOOK_MIDDLE for now, it will be the same as jk
Should I close the corresponding bugs? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
