jean-frederic clere wrote: > Henri Gomez wrote: > >>jean-frederic clere wrote: >> >> >>>Henri Gomez wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Glenn Nielsen wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Henri, >>>>> >>>>>It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook >>>>>priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that >>>>>the best solution for this will not be found until we have >>>>>an extensive test suite to test use of mod_jk 1/2 with other >>>>>modules. So if a change is made we can make sure use of >>>>>mod_jk with other modules hasn't been broken. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Jean-Frederic Clere send us a link to a french site where the >>>>Apache specialist speaking about jk2 and rewrite used jk2 >>>>in FIRST but indicating that rewrite is the precedent. >>> >>> >>> >>>Why using APR_HOOK_MIDDLE for translate_name : >>>- It will be like mod_jk. >>>- It works for me with mod_dav and mod_rewrite (fixes 21549 and 21546). >>> >>>Why not using APR_HOOK_FIRST: >>>- It does not work with mod_dav. >>> >>>BTW: Mod_dav.c does not have translate_name I use a <Location> to get DAV >>>activated on the needed URL. Core.c use APR_HOOK_REALLY_LAST and >>>mod_rewrite >>>APR_HOOK_FIRST so I do not understand why 21546 get fixed by using >>>APR_HOOK_MIDDLE. >> >> >>Ok, so I revert to APR_HOOK_MIDDLE for now, it will be the same as jk > > > Should I close the corresponding bugs?
No... At least not yet that is still not working correctly :-(( > > >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
