At 11:19 AM 8/12/2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: >--On Thursday, August 12, 2004 12:57 AM -0500 "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL >PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Although he's subscribed to all three lists, I'd ask that they go either >>to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] The history of the discussions is just >>as important as the actual code commits. > >Can we please not use [EMAIL PROTECTED] As long as the code resides in the main >httpd repository, development discussion belongs on [EMAIL PROTECTED], IMHO.
That seems rational to me. The reason for proposing [EMAIL PROTECTED] is so that tomcat-dev'ers wouldn't have to swallow the full bandwidth of [EMAIL PROTECTED] (converse of the problem where they asked anyone in [EMAIL PROTECTED] to follow [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the duration of that proxy_ajp development). So I ask our tomcat-dev'ers who are interested in proxy_ajp, proxy_balancer and so on - are you already subscribed/following [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or do you feel a -strong- need for a lower-traffic list? If no one complains loudly, we will keep all proxy traffic on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (cc's to tomcat-dev if you feel a point needs feedback from the tomcat connector folks.) Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
