Hi Euan Please note the server is now up for 48 hours strait. The change I've made is I've set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL to 2.2.5 I will update again in another 48 hours or if the server hangs, whichever comes first.....
Regards, Noam ----- Original Message ----- From: "Euan Guttridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 9:42 AM Subject: FW: tomcat jitters, then hangs - please help > Hi Noam, > > I work with Ryan on tomcat issues. I would be grateful if you would let me > know if your tomcat installation is *still* up (another 24 hours) since the > NPTL change as below. > > > Regards, > Euan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Noam Camiel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 October 2003 14:46 > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: tomcat jitters, then hangs - please help > > > Hi, > > On Friday, October 10, 2003 11:09 AM "Ryan Lissack" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Remy pointed out to me previously that RH9 uses a new form of threading > and > > based on this we have done some investigation. > > > > RH9 uses NTPL (Native POSIX Thread Library) > > http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-9-Manual/release-notes/x86/ > > > > It is possible to revert to the older form of threading, "LinuxThreads", > by > > setting an environment variable, namely: > > LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=<kernel-version> > > - 2.4.1 - Linuxthreads with floating stacks > > - 2.2.5 - Linuxthreads without floating stacks > > > > This does not revert back to an older kernel, it just changes the GNU C > > library used http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jtc/ > > > > We will be testing with these settings starting today and, if we continue > to > > have problems, we will be trying another distro. > > setting the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL variable, the server is now running over 24 > hours strait. > Still, nothing conclusive as of yet...... > Ryan, thanks for the information above. Do you have move information > regarding this configuration? do you still encounter problems? > > > On Monday, October 13, 2003 9:59 PM "Joe Zendle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > We had the same problem w/ TC 4.1.27, sun jvm 1.4.2 and redhat 9. The > > thing wouldn't work for more than about 12 hours. IMHO, there are some > > fundamental problems with tomcat as of late. Hate to say it but we > > solved the problem by throwing away tomcat and using jetty! We are very > > pleased so far. Jetty is very fast and about 1/3 the memory footprint. > > > > Good luck. > > > Hi Joe, > Thanks for sharing the info, I am considering what you suggest as well. > As a last try before moving away from Tomcat, I'm trying out the suggestion > from Ryan above. > Regards, > Noam. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
