Is there a similar setting for jk2 under 4.1.29? 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Barker
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:16 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: maxProcessors vs maxThreads
> 
> Oh, come on, get real :).  The Jk-Coyote docs are probably second to the
> mod_jk2 docs for being the most incomplete.  While (as Remy has stated),
> you
> can perfectly happily set this on the Connector, the jk2.properties syntax
> is:
>   container.maxThreads=<value>
> 
> "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Howdy,
> 
> >thanks yoav, i noticed that but then does that mean that there is no
> >method to specify max threads/processors for the coyote ajp connector?
> >that sounds a bit strange....
> 
> If it's not documented, then there's no configurable way to do it.  Of
> course, you can always subclass/extend a connector just like any other
> tomcat element to add the behavior you want.
> 
> >how does tomcat behave with the ajp connector? does it indefinitely
> spawn
> >threads to handle requests until it bombs out of memory? or is there
> >behaviour as specified by the acceptcount/max processors for the http
> >connector buried in the code of the ajp connector that can't be
> modified?
> 
> I don't use the AJP connector, so I can't answer that one, but the code
> is open for you to inspect at your leisure...
> 
> Yoav Shapira
> 
> 
> 
> This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business
> communication, and may contain information that is confidential,
> proprietary
> and/or privileged.  This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to
> whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or
> used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please
> immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the
> sender.  Thank you.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to