Costin, Thank you very much for this claification!!! Could you, or someone, advise/point to document on where "jk2" is with regards to function completion?
Thanks, Anthony > On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Anthony W. Marino wrote: > > I'm confused with the state of the connectors available for > > Apache2/Tomcat integration. Could someone, please, shed some light on > > this. The following is some of what I've read/interpreted from messages > > on this list: > > > > mod_jk: Unstable > > mod_jk2: Bleeding edge for development purposes only > > mod_webapp: Next generation integration module for Apache/Tomcat that > > will eventually replace mod_jk's. However, performance hit since even > > static pages will have to go through Tomcat before being served by > > Apache. > > mod_jk is stable and works fine with apache2 and all tomcats. > There is a bug in the tar.gz, but the CVS head is tested and works > great. We'll update the tars on the first release of tomcat. > > mod_jk2 is getting close to feature-complete, but you should stick with > mod_jk for production until ready. > > mod_webapp is _not_ the "next generation" nor "replaces" mod_jk. > It's just another connector, wrote by a different person in a different > way. It's author doesn't like mod_jk, and people working on jk don't > like webapp - you can choose whatever _you_ like. > > Costin -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
