Paul, FYI, the Sun compiler was installed and the Sys Admin alerted me to the "Sun doesn't ship the OS with a compiler anymore" situation. :)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Brzezinski, Paul J [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 10:50 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: mod_jk build problems > Importance: High > > > > > -- > mailto:Paul.Brzezinski@;EDS.com > Enterprise Distributed Capabilities > EDS Corporation > 248-265-8283 > > > : -----Original Message----- > : From: Turner, John [mailto:JTurner@;AAS.com] > : Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 11:24 AM > : To: 'Tomcat Users List' > : Subject: RE: mod_jk build problems > : > : > : > : Must be a Solaris 7 deal...once I got the requisite packages > : installed on Solaris 8, I did OK. For the archives: > : > : Sun Solaris 8 Developer Install, Initial > : Sun Solaris 8_Recommended patch cluster > : Everything listed here: http://www.sugoi.org/bits/index.php?bit_id=12 > : OpenSSL and OpenSSH > : JDK > : > : and the following from sunfreeware.com: > : > : autoconf > : automake > : binutils > : gcc (I used version 2.95.3) > : glib > : gzip > : libtool > : make > : tar > : wget > : zlib > : > : That was what it took to make my Solaris 8 box happy with > : GNU-oriented builds. Previously, I kept getting errors that > : said "C Compile is unable to generate executables" which > : didn't make much sense. After installing all of the above, > : that problem went away and I was able to do the builds. > > Even if you install developer bundle -- you only get things like the > headers > files, and some extra stuff (like sccs, make, m4, what, yacc, strip, > ranlib) > in /usr/ccs/bin, the cc in /usr/ucb on Solaris is just a script now that > basically says you need to buy a compiler, Sun no longer includes the K&R > C > compiler since Solaris 2.x has the capability to regenerate portions of > the > kernel dynamically when you add devices to your system (reboot -- -r or > boot > -r from OK prompt on SPARC) > > : John > : > : > : > -----Original Message----- > : > From: Madere, Colin [mailto:colin.madere@;ieminc.com] > : > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 11:13 AM > : > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > : > Subject: RE: mod_jk build problems > : > > : > > : > There is something wrong with the build system (at least for > : > solaris) as I > : > had to go into the apache-2.0 directory and manually do a > : > "make mod_jk.so" > : > and then it built it. Now looking it is also in the .libs > : > dir, but with the > : > same timestamp and size as the .so NOT in the .libs dir. <shrug> > : > > : > As for the build tools, I had to actually get the version of > : > autoconf (2.54) > : > that was not officially released yet (2.53 is the current > : > official release > : > as of a couple of days ago on gnu.org). autoconf 2.54 isn't > : > listed on the > : > site, but is on the ftp site for download. > : > > : > > -----Original Message----- > : > > From: Manuel González Castro [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > : > > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 1:46 AM > : > > To: Tomcat Users List > : > > Subject: Re: mod_jk build problems > : > > > : > > >JK will finish w/o errors but no .so is present when done > : > (and yes I've > : > > >searched thoroughly) (just tried again and now getting > : > same errors as > : > > >below). > : > > > : > > On SGI IRIX 6.5 mod_jk.so is under > : > jk/native/apache-2.0/.libs instead of > : > > jk/native/apache-2.0, and the .libs dir is hidden. Did you > : > tried find > : > > . -name "mod_jk*" ? > : > > > : > : -- > : To unsubscribe, e-mail: > : <mailto:tomcat-user-: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : For > : additional commands, > : e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > : > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:tomcat-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>