Howdy,

>Well not really; we know that we are running Tomcat, a web container
which
>has its own (fixed) characteristics.  It is a server side app which is
>processing non state based transactions which are thus highly like to
>involve a lot of objects being created and destroyed without too many
>hanging around for long;  the details of the webapp, unless it is
highly
>unusual, are likely not to matter particularly.  This is a rule of
thumb
>not an exact science and the vast majority of people who run Tomcat
would
>benefit from running in such a configuration (or playing with it to see
>what the effects were)

I disagree ;)

Every time I've tuned a webapp for pay, both transactional and not, both
full J2EE and "just" servlets/JSPs, the above has been false.  The
webapp's specific implementation matters far more (typically 3-4 orders
of magnitude) than the container implementation, especially for a mature
container which has been tuned repetitively and carefully over time.
It's precisely because of this, and because as you say performance
tuning is not a science, that a rule of thumb is as likely to hurt as it
is to help if blindly applied.

> read Sun's own tuning documentation and you will
>see the default settings are not said to be suitable for the majority
of
>server apps.

I appreciate the pointer - I used to help write them ;)

Good luck, however, as it's always YMMV with these things.

Yoav Shapira



This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and 
may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This 
e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be 
saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) 
intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system 
and notify the sender.  Thank you.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to