Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Bonnie Corwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-23 20:13]: >> Richard Lowe wrote: >> >Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > >> > >> >> All the details are in the subcategories, but here's the current >> >> product/category (classification/product?) list that is published to >> >> bugs.opensolaris.org from the legacy DTS. (Some subcategories are >> >> excluded, apparently.) >> >> >> > >> > >> >It'd be work syncing up with Derek, and the owners of the excluded >> >subcats (or even entire categories), to figure out which are intentional, >> >and which are in error. Every so often we catch one that's hidden >> >because that's how things default. >> >> [Sensible response from Bonnie.] > > Although I understand the interest, this thread is not about b.o.o. > visibility/errors in visibility. It's about mapping the current bug > categorization to the abstractions presented by the current DTS > candidate in the sandbox, presumably by starting off with a check that > the current approach to categorization is sane. >
Sure, I was suggesting that it maybe better to start with a complete set of data, rather than assuming that b.o.o has the complete set... -- Rich _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
