On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Tim Landscheidt <t...@tim-landscheidt.de> wrote: > (anonymous) wrote: > >>> until now I had the impression that we (you, the authors, and me) fight >>> together against WMF and WMDE for keeping the Toolserver and against Labs. >>> Some mails and discussion in the last days gives me now the impression that >>> this was wrong and (at least some of) you are eager to leave the toolserver >>> as >>> soon as possible. >>> There is no point to beg the WMDE for new hardware and to invest much more >>> time if 2 weeks after Labs is "ready" the toolserver will be empty. For this >>> reason I created a survey at [1] that starts at midnight. Please take a >>> moment >>> of your time and place your nick in the section that suits you. > >>> Sincerely, >>> DaB. > >>> [1] https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Labs-Moving-Survey > >> I wish there were an option saying "move when XXX and YYY features are >> available and / or provided better on Labs". > > That's "move as soon as possible".
That's not exactly the same, especially when I add the clause "provided better on Labs". When some features I require are poorly available on Labs, it's still "possible to move", but in the case that, if I decide to move, I have to - for example - work around many issues on Labs, or have some more difficult development work to do in order to utilize those features on Labs, I'll still still stay on Toolserver. -Liangent > Tim > > > _______________________________________________ > Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l > Posting guidelines for this list: > https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette _______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
