Of course I understand the topic. Web sdrs have the worse receiving capabilities. I see no reason at all to use one.
But you did not answer my question concerning the sdrs. Please do, if possible with the links to them. 73 Peter -----Original Message----- From: uy0zg [mailto:uy...@mksat.net] Sent: Samstag, 11. Januar 2020 22:15 To: peter.voel...@t-online.de Cc: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: New Modes, Systems, etc You Peter did not understand the topic. Participants ( contests on 160 ?) from Eastern Europe use receivers in the USA, Japan and Australia. They feel completely unpunished. This is the main problem! --- Nick, UY0ZG http://www.topband.in.ua dj...@t-online.de ????? 2020-01-11 22:05: > If my 160m receive would be as bad as with any web sdr I would not > contest > on that band. > Which web sdr is used from Eastern Europe? > > 73 > Peter > > -----Original Message----- > From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces+dj7ww=t-online...@contesting.com] > On > Behalf Of uy0zg > > Serious problems for topband are the use of WEB.SDR. Especially in > Eastern Europe. The goal of such scammers is the highest places in > popular contests at 160 meters. > This problem is N1. _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector