"M. Sean Gilligan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

I took a good look at the JndiDataSourceFactory and this patch just
plasters over (there is also a good NPE chance in there)

I reworked the config logic a bit, please try out, this should be
better now.

[....]

> I plan on trying out a build tomorrow.  My CVS tree has the latest
> code, but I should probably build a patched version based on the
> TORQUE_3_1_1 tag if I want to put this into "production", right?

I would prefer having you test the TORQUE_3_1_BRANCH HEAD by doing

cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic checkout -r TORQUE_3_1_BRANCH 
db-torque

and compiling it, but if you are stuck to a released version due to QA
reasons, simply take the released 3.1.1 version and replace the
JndiDataSourceFactory.java file.

        Regards
                Henning

-- 
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen          INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]        +49 9131 50 654 0   http://www.intermeta.de/

RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development  -- hero for hire
   Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development

What is more important to you...
   [ ] Product Security
or [ ] Quality of Sales and Marketing Support
              -- actual question from a Microsoft customer survey

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to