On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Adrian Buehlmann <adr...@cadifra.com> wrote:
> On 03.02.2010 15:51, Adrian Buehlmann wrote:
>> So we might do
>>
>>    1.0.1000, 1.0.1001, 1.0.1002, ..  for stable nightlies
>>    1.0.2000, 1.0.2001, 1.0.2001, ..  for unstable nightlies
>>    1.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.3 ...       for official releases
>>
>
> Of course this should be:
>
>    1.0.1000, 1.0.1001, 1.0.1002, ..  for stable nightlies
>    1.0.2000, 1.0.2001, 1.0.2002, ..  for unstable nightlies
>    1.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 ...       for official releases
>
> (too many similar numbers :-)
>

Official releases would be 1.0, 1.1, 1.2 (just like hg)
Patch releases would be 1.0.1, etc.

If we're just talking about package numbers, not the version numbers
that go into executables and DLLs, then I think I would prefer to take
the 'tagdistance' number of the THG repo and add an offset based on
stable/unstable

So..1.1+42-62210b9542c8 would generate an unstable package with version:

1.1.2042

--
Steve Borho

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Tortoisehg-develop mailing list
Tortoisehg-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop

Reply via email to