Mnyb;580617 Wrote: > My point was that beyond a certain quality level there is very little > difference or no difference between digital transports these day's . > Pair that with bitperfect rips and where are these $$$ digital > transports ? > This is progress but would stereophile or it's readers acknowledge this > ? > > They want to relish in $$$ digital cables and "stuff" like quantum > purifiers ;) > > what would the criteria be for grading digital transports that are the > same ;) price or high end looks or what ? Surprised that someone not > yet managed to stick a tube inside a digital transport ? > > The Touch as digital transport would be graded against other digital > transports if get stereophiles rating system right a class A thing > would be one of the best of it's kind .But in digital transports this > would be less meaningful than it once was. Also consider modern DAC's > and processors very resilient against "bad" transports. > > So yea Touch = A-D (Digital -Analog) > > > Analog is another deal here is differences that can be heard, that are > meaningfull to rate and grade . > I would like a third rating for "product quality" I suppose part of the > rating reflects that nowadays to . Product quality has many dimensions > but that would be another post.
Agree entirely. I think I had misunderstood your previous post. Cheers -- KGJ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ KGJ's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37772 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=81346 _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
