Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote: > -On [20060922 20:26], Ilias Lazaridis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >If I develope plugins, I need to develop them twice (0.10, then porting > >to 0.11). Most possibly, developers will develope with CS, to run under > >both, 0.10 and 0.11 (which will delay the "total" Genshi migration). > > > >So, wouldn't it be better to integrate the Genshi modifications in an > >non-intrusive way into 0.10, thus developers migrate immediately to > >Genshi? 0.11 would then be able to _remove_ clearsilver dependency (as > >everything relevant will have been ported until then). > > > >So, ideally, the "Genshi Enabling Additions" should find their way soon > >into 0.10.x - I think everyone will agree here. > > No, people have disagreed with that idea.
There is nothing to disagree. The idea is correct - another thing is the workload. > Christopher also pointed out that while 0.11 will focus on Genshi, if you > still have Clearsilver installed you can still use Clearsilver plugins. As said, I like to avoid parallel development effort (and I like to avoid clearsilver). > So they are already following a nice deprecation route, keeping functionality > in 0.11 for CS, adding in Genshi, and in a subsequent release start taking CS > out. I've given the rationales above, why this route is not nice. > Your way of deprecation c.q. ripping out CS from 0.11 already and introducing > Genshi into a running 0.10.x branch quite frankly appals from me a design > perspective. Clearsilver can stay until trac 6.17, I've no problem with this. My interest is to get Genshi into 0.10. If Genshi is integrated carefully, it will not affect the 0.10 version. > >As to the effort: > > > >[REQUOTE] > >I could provide the necessary analytical / abstraction work for doing > >this. > >[?REQUOTE] > > I think they are not interested in anything commercial, which is what you seem > to be hinting at. Sorry, but this is completely nonsense. > And when it comes to abstraction and analysis work I've become quite impressed > by the main Trac developers and various contributors. This is not about abilities, but about workload. I simply like to estimate the effort - and this conversation is not very helpful. . http://lazaridis.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
